One real de-identified study, rotating daily. You get the referral and the nine panels; you measure it, call each finding, and commit to a differential and a report before any of it is revealed.
Fourteen studies, one per day, then it comes round again. Every one of them is a full interpretation module — nothing is held back for the daily version.
Read a normal maximal study from end to end — what every panel
Answer the question a referral asked on a study whose headline
Report a study with nothing outside its range — decide what
Read a study where the aerobic capacity is ordinary and the
Report a submaximal study honestly — say which numbers the
Report a study that lasted five minutes — decide whether to
Read a repeat study on its own terms, then say what changed —
Report a study whose answer arrives after the exercise ends —
Report a study read against a diagnosis already in the chart
Report a study on a patient whose diagnosis is already known —
Report a study whose numbers are inputs to a listing decision —
Report one of the two most abnormal studies in the library — group ten
Report a study on the chamber the resting workup could not
Report a study whose abnormal rows are one abnormality — and
Read one study against two different referral questions and